Follow the Money
When it comes to the subject of vaping, telling the truth certainly isn't the U.S. media's strong suit.
There are several reasons for the complicated relationship between the U.S. media and the vaping industry. One of the most prominent of these being the teen vaping epidemic.
The teen vaping epidemic has created a strong undercurrent against vaping among non-smoking U.S. parents. The media - always desperate for clicks and shares - has played on that by using vaping-related headlines to inspire panic.
In addition, it hasn't helped that some of the most powerful individuals in the media - such as billionaire Michael Bloomberg - are decidedly against vaping and would prefer to see it banned entirely.
Bloomberg also funds the tobacco control arm of the World Health Organisation, thus giving worldwide amplification to his anti-vaping rhetoric.
The problem with the media bias against vaping is that the U.S. is the pipeline through which much of the world's news flows. If you get your news from an aggregator like Google News, you're going to see a highly U.S.-centric point of view.
When our own government needs to publish a press release correcting misconceptions about vaping that the U.S. media has helped to create, that's a real problem.
With all this in mind, whenever you see a news headline about vaping that's spiked with alarm and clearly designed to bait you into clicking, you should read it with a healthy dose of scepticism.
Who is funding that headline? Who would benefit if you were swayed by the views presented? It's always wise to follow the money.


